- UCAR Home
- About Us
- For Staff
Bob Henson | 28 April 2011 • The devastating rash of tornadoes that swept through the southeast United States on 27 April has already carved its way into the annals of twister history. A total of more than 160 tornadoes was reported in the preliminary count released by the NOAA Storm Prediction Center for the 24-hour period from 7:00 AM CDT 27 April to 28 April. That total will drop over time, as duplicate reports are filtered out, but it should still rank among the top one-day totals on record. And more than 200 people were killed—the worst U.S. death toll from tornadoes since the Super Outbreak of 3–4 April 1974, which remains the most prolific producer in tornado history.
How could such a disaster happen in 2011? A number of factors—meteorological, geographical, and sociological—came together in a rare and deadly way.
Hours before the tornadoes began in earnest, forecasters were deeply concerned about the day’s potential for trouble. The classic elements of tornado production were in place across a huge area:
Often a fast-moving front will generate a solid line of intense thunderstorms but few or no tornadoes. However, on 27 April, the configuration of winds and the large zone of instability meant that thunderstorms could easily develop or move east of the cold front while retaining their tornadic potential.
Forecasters often use “composite indices” that blend the above ingredients to see where the highest tornado risk might emerge. These have been developed by NOAA and university researchers as well as by several private firms, including The Weather Channel, which employs the TOR:CON index.
Given that several of the tornado ingredients were unusually strong on 27 April, the composite indices were jaw-droppingly high, and the official outlooks reflected that. At 1:10 a.m. CDT, more than 12 hours before the outbreak hit full force, NOAA’s Storm Prediction Center placed northern Alabama and parts of adjoining states under a “high risk”—its highest threat level—and noted the potential for strong, long-lived tornadoes. Tornado watches issued by early afternoon labeled the setup a “particularly dangerous situation.” Forecasters underlined the threat even further in regular weather discussions issued by National Weather Service offices. An NWS meteorologist in Jackson, Mississippi, warned in a late-morning discussion: “I can’t stress enough how dangerous this situation appears.”
Once the storms got cooking, the NWS issued warnings that were both timely and strongly worded. Local weathercasters, such as pioneering weather blogger James Spann at Birmingham’s ABC 33/40, also provided exhaustive coverage. But as the day’s events showed, excellent warnings aren’t enough to prevent a large death toll—even in 2011. What happened?
Some mobile home parks are now providing shelters, either to meet state requirements (as in Minnesota) or through grants and other initiatives (as in this Wisconsin example). However, many states have no such requirements, and many thousands of people across the South live in single mobile homes on small acreages. As a group, mobile home residents tend to have little lobbying clout, and there’s no sign of any push for national requirements—so, unfortunately, we may continue to see high tornado death tolls among mobile home residents.
Of course, many free-standing structures were also demolished by the 27 April tornadoes. In moderately strong tornadoes, people often survive by clustering in a hallway or closet (sometimes the only parts of a building that survive). However, a tornado rated EF5 on the Enhanced Fujita Tornado Damage Scale—with wind gusts exceeding 200 mph—can sweep a home off its foundation, leaving no margin of safety short of a basement.
One of the big questions to be addressed in post-storm analysis is how many of the day’s deaths were essentially unavoidable and how many might have been averted. U.S. tornado deaths dropped dramatically from the 1920s through the end of the 20th century when adjusted for population, according to this analysis by Harold Brooks (National Severe Storms Laboratory). However, as shown on the graph below, the improvement seemed to level off after about 2000. The fatalities from 27 April 2011—as well as the 45 other deaths observed this year up to 26 April—will only add to this effect. It remains unclear why this is happening and whether it'll become a longer-term trend.
Key mysteries remain in how tornadoes and tornadic thunderstorms evolve, and some answers may emerge from analyses of data gathered in the exhaustive VORTEX2 project from 2009–10. One thing is unlikely to change, however. “When you have violent, huge tornadoes moving through urban areas, they will cause casualties,” notes tornado forecaster Roger Edwards. In some initial thoughts posted on his “Weather or Not” blog, Edwards muses: “Perhaps the main emphasis of study of this event should be more from a preparedness and societal angle than atmospheric (though I’m sure there are new aspects to learn and papers to be written meteorologically also).” Edwards' post also includes links to several of the most impressive videos from this major outbreak.
In 2005, New Orleans was known to be at high risk of a hurricane catastrophe. Yet it had been many years since a hurricane had killed more than 100 Americans, which added to the shock of Katrina’s death toll. No matter what the weather threat, even the best warnings conveyed through omnipresent media aren’t enough to prevent disaster when people don’t, or can’t, get themselves to safety.
The University Corporation for Atmospheric Research manages the National Center for Atmospheric Research under sponsorship by the National Science Foundation. Any opinions, findings and conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.